Monday, July 12, 2010

For shame

Just because the newly announced NCAA tournament format isn't as disastrous as doubling the whole field doesn't mean it shouldn't be derided for what it is. Stupid.

Under the new guidelines, a new round, the "First Four" round, will be played early in the week between the last four "at-large teams" against the final four "automatic qualifiers". The greed works thusly...
The "First Four" will be played either the Tuesday or Wednesday after Selection Sunday. The winners of the four games will advance to what will now be called the "second round" on either Thursday or Friday. The newly named third round -- with 16 games -- will be Saturday and Sunday.
It's just dumb. No matter how hard they try to redefine a lexicon that has arisen organically, the new "first round" will be recognized for what it is, a stupid gimmick to maximize revenue.

It's not a "round" if only eight teams have to play. And you're no longer an "automatic qualifier" if you must jump through another hoop than the rest of the field to join the Big Dance.

The Selection Committee's task is an unscientific endeavor, but at least it's a line in the sand.

To throw another subjective rung in the mix, this one covered by thinly-veiled greed, it flirts with permanently scarring our March Love Affair.

And, without a doubt, that is the end game. This is the initial push down the slippery slope to the expanded field that every CBS and ESPN suit wants to see. It further devalues our terminology and paves the way for the "expanded field" to be more palatable...

"Wow! Did you watch last night? What a great game! Look how many quality teams are out there! How can we deny these young athletes a chance at March glory? Let's expand the whole tournament! Huh? Huh?!?"

The Big Dance should be the great equalizer. You punch your ticket, you win 6 games, you reap the glory. Adding qualifiers bastardizes the process and muddles our March language, except for one word. Greed.

5 comments:

  1. no matter what you think its better then doing nothing
    ReplyDelete
  2. Apple,

    Why? What's wrong with it the way it is now? Are you a Tar Heel? Nothing is exactly what should have been done. Also, it's "better THAN."
    ReplyDelete
  3. The one thing that can be said in favor of this stupid move is that it allows four teams to actually win a tournament game who otherwise wouldn't have had a prayer of doing so, and might not even have been in the field of 64. Those four teams will get some exposure and some revenue out of the deal.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Honestly, I think this is their chance to sneak in even more teams over the next few years till it is doubled. Eventually it will be a watered down tournament.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Gotta side with Mr. Red on this one. Don't try to fix something that isn't broken. The tournament is terrific as is and pre-reform the opening round had the perfect balance of upsets, making it in many ways the most exciting part of the tournament. They're messing with that. Bad idea.

    NCAA should concentrate their reform zeal on the BCS if they're this itchy for action. If you were to ask which needs immediate fixing or even tinkering, the BCS or NCAA tournament, which would you choose? End of story.
    ReplyDelete

Blog Archive

About the Bloggers


Mr. Red is also known as Timothy Johnstone. He is a graduate of the University of Louisville.

Mr. Black is also known as Christopher Cunningham. He is a graduate of the University of Louisville.


CliffySmalls is also known as Cliff Elliott. He is a graduate of the University of Louisville.